Fed. Cir. No. 2020-2044: The Federal Circuit found that the patents were directed to an abstract idea, with no additional elements to transform them into patentable subject-matter.
Fed. Cir. No. 2020-1760: The CAFC sided with Apple and Samsung, finding a patent for an “improved” digital camera to be an abstract idea and not patent-eligible subject matter.
(No. 14-1802 Fed. Cir.) - The CAFC held that a patentee does not have to prove that the infringing features of a competitor’s product were the exclusive or predominant reason why consumers bought the competitor’s product to obtain an injunction for patent infringement. Rather, it is sufficient to prove that there was some connection between the infringing features and the demand for the competitor’s product.
Interbrand released its annual Best Global Brands ranking for 2013 on September 30, 2013. The report, whose methodology is described here, proves once again that brands […]
HTC v. Apple, [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Court of Appeals of England and Wales) Per Kitchin L.J. (Richards L.J. concurring): This appeal was concerned with […]