- Filter by
- Categories
- Tags
- Show all
- Article
- Confusion
- Contract
- Copyright
- Corporate
- Domain Names
- Employment
- Expungement
- Expungement
- Grey Marketing
- Industrial Designs
- Licensing
- Obviousness
- Opposition
- Passing Off
- Patent
- Patent Infringement
- Patent Strategy
- PM(NOC)
- Procedure
- Prosecution
- recognition
- Services
- Summary
- Trade Secrets
- Trade-mark
- Use
- Validity
- 2019
- 35 US Code §101
- 3D printing
- 6.08
- Abandonment
- abstract
- abstract theorems
- accounting of profits
- acquired distinctiveness
- actions
- actual notice
- agreement
- agreements
- airport security
- Alice/Mayo Test
- Ambiguity
- Amending
- amendment
- Amendments
- annual maintenance fee
- Anticipation
- Appeal
- application
- application chain
- application fee
- arbitrary
- arbitration
- Assignment
- Australia
- Bad Faith
- Bargain Theory
- bill
- Bill C-31
- Bill C-43
- Bill C-8
- Bill C-86
- biologics
- biosimilar
- Biotech Patents
- Blockchain
- border measures
- Brand
- branding
- broadcasting
- budget
- burden of proof
- business
- CAFC
- call processing
- Canada
- Canada Gazette
- Cannabis Law
- causal link
- cdrp
- CEEO
- Certificate of Supplementary Protection
- champerty
- Chemical Patent
- chemistry
- ciba
- CIPO
- CIPO errors
- CIRA
- Claim Construction
- Class Actions
- clerical error
- college of agents
- combination
- combination drugs
- commissioner
- Common General Knowledge
- Complete Code
- confidential
- Confidential Information
- confidentiality
- confidentiality order
- Conflict of Interest
- confusing
- confusingly similar
- confusion
- constitution
- constitutional
- constitutionality
- consumer goods
- contract
- contributory infringement
- Copyright
- Copyright Infringement
- copyright test
- corrections
- Costs
- counterfeit
- COVID-19
- CSP
- cybersecurity
- Damages
- Data
- Data Protection
- deadline
- deadlines
- defamation
- defences
- delay to market entry
- delayed market entry
- descriptive
- Design Patents
- deviation
- digital infringement
- disclosure
- distinctive
- distinctive feature
- distinctiveness
- Diversity
- division of powers
- divisionals
- DNA Patents
- domain
- domain names
- dominant feature
- dosage range
- Double Patenting
- doubtful cases
- due care
- E-Commerce
- Early dismissal
- economics
- errors
- essentiality of elements
- Ethics
- Europe
- Events
- Evidence
- examination quality
- examination statistics
- Examiner
- expert
- expert blinding
- expert evidence
- Experts
- expiry
- Expungement
- extraterritoriality
- federal circuit
- Federal Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- fee
- fees
- file wrapper
- Filing
- filing date
- filing fee
- financial services
- foreign issue estoppel
- forum selection
- fraud
- Free World Trust
- frivolous
- funding
- future infringement
- generics
- geographical indications
- global
- Good Faith
- goods
- Government
- grace period
- grey marketing
- Hague
- hearsay
- hearsay evidence
- Honest Contractual Performance
- ICSID
- Illegality
- Improver
- imunity
- Indefiniteness
- Inducement
- Industrial Designs
- inherent distinctiveness
- injunction
- Injunctions
- Innovation
- insufficiency
- insufficient disclosure
- Intellectual Property
- intent
- Inter Partes Review
- interlocutory injunction
- Internet
- intra vires
- invalidated
- invalidation
- inventor removal
- inventorship
- IP Lawyer
- IP management
- ip regime
- IP Strategy
- IPIC
- IPO
- ISP
- IT patent
- ITC
- Jurisdiction
- Late fee
- Legal Retainer
- legal test
- legislative reform
- legitimate interest
- Licensing
- life science
- limitation periods
- Litigation
- litigation evidence
- litigation funding agreement
- madrid
- maintenance
- material facts
- materiality
- method
- Methods of Medical Treatment
- minister of health
- misleading
- monopoly
- motion
- Motion to dismiss
- Motion to strike
- NAFTA
- national phase entry
- new act
- new evidence
- no chance of success
- Non-Infringing Alternative
- notice of allegation
- notice to rectify
- novelty
- obivous error
- Obviousness
- Office
- official mark
- official marks
- on-sale
- on-sale bar
- Online
- ontario
- opposition
- outsourcing
- Overbreadth
- overlapping
- ownership
- Ownership & Inventorship
- PAB
- Passing Off
- patent abandonment
- Patent Act
- patent agent
- Patent Agents
- patent appeal board
- Patent Application
- Patent Drafting
- Patent Infringement
- Patent Litigation
- Patent Office
- patent office errors
- patent owner
- patent ownership
- patent practicioner
- patent prosecution
- patent protection
- patent requirement
- Patent Rules
- Patent Strategy
- patent term adjustment
- Patent Textbook
- Patent Trial and Appeal Board
- Patent Trolls
- patentability
- Patentable Subject Matter
- Patents
- PCT
- Pharmaceutical Patent
- Pharmaceutical Pricing
- PLT
- PM(NOC)
- PM(NOC) Damages
- PMPRB
- POSITA
- price regulation
- pride
- prior art
- prior disclosure
- prior disclosure defence
- prior use
- priority
- priority claim
- priority claims
- priority date
- Privilege
- procedure
- Product Specificity
- profit
- prohibited marks
- Promise Doctrine
- proprietor
- Prosecution
- Prosecution History
- protective order
- prothonotaries
- Provisional Patent
- public sale
- Public Servant
- Punitive Damages
- Recognition
- Records
- registration
- reinstatement
- relevant date for construction
- Remedies
- representation
- request for correction
- requisition
- responding
- review
- risk
- Royalties
- s. 27
- s. 45
- s. 53
- sale
- Scheduling
- SCOTUS
- second person
- Secondary Infringement
- secondary meaning
- secret sale
- section 28
- Section 45
- section 50
- Section 52
- section 56
- section 7
- security
- selection patents
- Services
- settlement
- skilled person
- software
- Software Copyright
- Software Patent
- software patents
- Sound Prediction
- specification
- sponsorship
- SRED
- Standard of Review
- Standard-Essential Patents
- standing
- standing to appeal
- Start-up
- Startups
- statute of monopolies
- stay
- Strategy
- Sufficiency
- Summary Judgment
- summary trial
- superior court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- surname
- Technology
- Telecommunications
- test
- third party
- time frame
- top patent agent
- TPP
- Trade Secrets
- Trade-Mark
- trade-marks act
- Trademark
- Trademark Act
- trademark agent
- Trademark Infringement
- trademark opposition
- Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
- Trademarks use
- treaty
- UK
- united kingdom
- United States
- unpatentable
- untrue material allegation
- Use
- useful article
- USMCA
- USPTO
- Utility
- Validity
- variant
- Varying records
- Velocity
- vexatious
- who's who legal
- Written Description
April 5, 2016
April 5, 2016
2015 FC 125 - The existing patent was invalid on the grounds of lack of utility for having made a promise of utility that could not be demonstrated nor soundly predicted, was anticipated by a previous patent of the applicant that claimed an overlapping dosage range, and was also therefore made obvious by the same previous patent.
March 3, 2015
March 3, 2015
Alcon Canada Inc v Cobalt Pharmaceuticals Company, 2014 FC 149 - The Court examined in detail a number of experiments disclosed in the patent that were said to establish the claimed utility, but the experiments did not demonstrate or soundly predict utility for the broad ranges of molecular weight and chemical concentration claimed.
November 21, 2014
November 21, 2014
Apotex Inc v Pfizer Canada Inc, 2014 FCA 250 - The Court rejected Apotex’s sweeping argument that any given promise in the patent must be construed as overarching to all of the patent’s claims.
October 27, 2014
October 27, 2014
Dow Chemical Co v NOVA Chemicals Corp, 2014 FC 844 - The Federal Court found that NOVA Chemicals infringed Canadian Patent No. 2,160,705, owned by The Dow Chemical Company, by NOVA’s use of its “SURPASS” polyethylene product. Allegations of invalidity for lack of utility, claims broader than any invention made or disclosed, anticipation, obviousness, double patenting, and insufficiency of the specification were unsuccessful.
July 31, 2014
July 31, 2014
Allergan Inc v Apotex Inc, 2014 FC 567 - In terms of claim construction, this case shows the tension between construing claims based solely on the wording of the claims versus peering beyond the wording of the claims to distill an underlying invention.