• testimonial-pintys

    We recently transferred our business to Mary Malvaso of Perry + Currier; the move was seamless. We value their expertise and commitment to our business.

    Jill Moore
    Marketing Manager Media, Sponsorships and Trade
  • PCK has been one of the best kept secrets of the Canadian IP bar. They are absolutely first class, and have done a tremendous job helping Holiday and its related companies with their patent and trademark litigation and prosecution.

    Catherine Lechter
    Vice President, Legal
  • testimonial-tmx

    We've used Perry and Currier for the past 9 years to assist us with growing and maintaining our patent portfolio worldwide They are practical and business minded and have a keen understanding of how the business and legal issues work together in the patent landscape.

    Rebecca Brackley
    Director Commercial Services
  • testimonial-street

    Bob, Ryan and the PCK team are the best around - always available, always on point, and always valuable - I would recommend them without a moment's hesitation.

  • testimonial-wm

    It was a pleasure working with PCK. They understand the startup community and its challenges, and provided us with friendly, expedient, and high quality service with a personal touch. We would strongly recommend their services in the future.

    Hany Fahim
    CEO
  • testimonial-redknee

    In our start up days, Andrew helped us prosecute and issue our first patent applications. Today, Redknee is a highly successful global enterprise, and Andrew and PCK now provide us with patent services, worldwide strategic advice and portfolio management in all aspects of intellectual property law.

    Robert Brain
    Vice President and General Counsel Redknee Solutions Inc.
  • testimonial-mitel

    As we transition to a global entity with one brand, one voice, PCK will continue providing us with top notch IP protection. Stephen and the Perry + Currier team are second to none.

    Michelle Whittington
    IP Counsel
  • testimonial-virox

    The personal care and genuine interest in creating the most buoyant and successful IP portfolio is evident every time we interact with our lead counsel Dolly Kao.

    Randy Pilon
    President, CEO
  • testimonial-ranovus

    We were looking for a strong Corporate Counsel and Intellectual Property partner who could understand our business and support our expansion in the US and Europe when I came across Peter Bormann and David Johnson from PCKIP. We consistently get world class engagement from both and see them as an integral part of our growing business.

    Hamid Arabzadeh
    Chairman and CEO
  • Eigen_logo_white

    The Industrial Internet of Things has the potential to add $3 trillion of value to the global economy. As a leading innovator in IIoT and industrial vision systems, Eigen Innovations requires an IP firm which provides timely and practical advice that is also strategic in helping us refine the direction of our technology. We have found PCK great to work with as a start-up in an industry segment that is complex and growing rapidly.

    Richard Jones
    CEO
  • itsme_logo We’re working on the cutting edge of virtual reality and we need to collaborate with other innovators. David Johnson at PCK ensures our IP needs are met quickly; he takes the time to understand our technology so that we can develop our patent strategy in alignment with our business goals. Such strategic advice is unfortunately rare and goes well beyond high-quality patent drafting.
    Pete Forde
    CEO
Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)
The World’s Leading Patent Practioners Recommended Firm
iam1000

Title

Innovation @ PCK

Hear Andrew Currier speak about Innovation at PCK

Podcast

Hear Andrew Currier speak about Innovation at PCK

Recent Blog Articles

August 24, 2016

PCK StartIP Series: 2 – Patent Grace Periods; A Way for a Lean Startup to Defer Patent Filing Costs

Provisional patent applications are the traditional way that a lean startup can obtain some preliminary patent protection at reasonable cost while they accelerate product development and […]
August 22, 2016

FC Bifurcates Infringement & Validity Issues from Section 8 PM(NOC) Proceeding in Hopes of Settlement

2016 FC 720 - The FC bifurcated the issues of infringement and validity from any other section 8 issue in hopes that bifurcation would likely lead to a settlement of all the issues between the parties.
August 19, 2016

Injunctions for Patent Infringement: Only “Some” Connection Between a Product’s Infringing Features And Demand For Competitor’s Product is Required

(No. 14-1802 Fed. Cir.) - The CAFC held that a patentee does not have to prove that the infringing features of a competitor’s product were the exclusive or predominant reason why consumers bought the competitor’s product to obtain an injunction for patent infringement. Rather, it is sufficient to prove that there was some connection between the infringing features and the demand for the competitor’s product.
August 15, 2016

Motion to Stay Denied –Defamation Action and Trade-marks Act Claim Proceed in Parallel

2015 ONSC 7980 - The SCJ decided that the legal tests and the remedies available in a defamation action and an action for false and misleading statements under the Trade-marks Act are different enough that a stay of proceeding to block one action before the conclusion of the other should be denied.

View All